Jump to content

Hope hub: 40T worth buying?


Martin Direske

Recommended Posts

Hi there!

It might be discussed already (actually I'm sure it has already been, but I can't find anything with your strange search-function).

I currently rebuild my Marino and finally decided to get a Hope hub again.

When looking for the Evo SSP I came across the new 40T version of it.

Since it seems to be quite new I couldn't find much information around whether it's just as good to use as the older version with less EP.

I'm aware of the fact that the only thing that was changed is the amount of EP but this might be a possible source of problems, could it?

(e.g. you don't feel every single EP as clear and easy as it has been before, which actually gave a certain security)

I heard of it being quieter in comparison to the previous as well?

Thank you!

Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ali built up one of the 40T hubs into his back wheel just before we went to Barcelona in January. He's still running the same hub now, without having had to do anything to it at all. They seem to be pretty decent.

If you're used to the older Hope hubs they do feel quite a bit different at first. It's kind of hard to describe, but I think it's just because there's not the same gap to the engagement point when you pedal it kind of feels weird. Definitely something you'd get used to pretty quickly though (Y)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark!

I might just be overcautious here, but a Hope hub is something more to me than just a freewheel you buy and replace everytime it's about to die. It's something reliable and shiny yet usefull I want to give to myself as a present after some harsh exam-days.

I used to have the regular Evo hub in the Skye back in the day and it never failed to amaze me how far freehubs have come. Apart from that one alloy-axle-break I had there never was an issue.

Therefore I would go for the same version immediatly in case someone would come up with experiences like "meehh, the 40t skipped on me more often than the regular ssp"

Also, did you notice a big difference in their sounds, Mark?

Thank you!

-edit-

I'm currently running 108EPs on both, Marino and Because. Souldn't be much of an issue to me to get used to it :)

-edit2-

I forgot to mention that I currently don't own a Hope at all.

I ask you here because I need to decide whether it's going to be the regular Evo SSP or the newer Evo SSP 40T :)

Edited by Martin Direske
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because of the extra clicks they kind of sound more like a King than the older Hope. They don't seem particularly quiet though, I rode with Flipp a couple of nights ago and his 40T hub seemed to be pretty loud!

The engagements still seem just as solid which is pretty surprising. I kind of assumed they wouldn't be as good due to the shallower ratchet and thought things would break more, but that doesn't really seem to be the case. The only person I know who's had trouble with them is Luke Cockshott, but he's destroyed two so I'm not really sure what's going on there (when there are a lot of people out there running them with no issues - I think Jack Carthy's had one on the rear of his Cleep for quite a while now and hasn't had any issues, so it's not like it's "just" been tried out by people riding street).

That issue with the alloy 12mm axle seems to have been solved by Hope producing the steel version now - it's heavier, but much, much stronger. If you're running a regular 10mm rear setup now though you shouldn't have any issues with the regular axle (Y)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought one back in mid May and I haven't had a single issue. It sounds identical to the day I bought it and not had even a sign of a skip. It has really positive engagement and just feels really sturdy, plus it looks mega cool :P I personally wouldn't go back to a FFW if it could be avoided :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because of the extra clicks they kind of sound more like a King than the older Hope. They don't seem particularly quiet though, I rode with Flipp a couple of nights ago and his 40T hub seemed to be pretty loud!

The engagements still seem just as solid which is pretty surprising. I kind of assumed they wouldn't be as good due to the shallower ratchet and thought things would break more, but that doesn't really seem to be the case. The only person I know who's had trouble with them is Luke Cockshott, but he's destroyed two so I'm not really sure what's going on there (when there are a lot of people out there running them with no issues - I think Jack Carthy's had one on the rear of his Cleep for quite a while now and hasn't had any issues, so it's not like it's "just" been tried out by people riding street).

That issue with the alloy 12mm axle seems to have been solved by Hope producing the steel version now - it's heavier, but much, much stronger. If you're running a regular 10mm rear setup now though you shouldn't have any issues with the regular axle (Y)

After speaking to Jacks dad at Radfest they have had to replace the bearings in the hub (more than once)

I have had problems with the bearings one both my rear EVO 40t hubs and one had to have the axle replaced as it was 1mm too wide where the bearings seat against it (one has been sent back to Hope twice now, Both hubs are less than 6 months old).

Karl had to send his back with a similar Axle issue (and bearings needing replaced).

They do work really well though and hopefully I won't have another problem but even if I did I wouldn't go back to the old one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Small update, i got mine yesterday, and rode it today, it is very very loud, the feeling is like a CK, but the engagements feel more precise, with 80 EP i can't feel any difference to a FW.

Will update again if problems appear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My first post on this forum--

my main bearings went, and then the roller bearing in the pawl mechanism. Haven't had much luck, but then again still cheaper than replacing freewheels. I must be really hard on drivetrains because in 3 years of trials riding I've gone through 4 freewheels, and rebuilt my Hope twice. I think my main problem is that my bike is often on the back of my car getting rained on, and I ride in rain and snow so water gets in there.

Cheers from Maryland, USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
1 minute ago, niconj said:

Upping this here. Does it make a huge difference running a Hope on the rear instead a FFW on the front? Weight difference is only 115gr. overall.

If you want to roll around, definitely. If you're riding comp-ish trials, maybe.

The engagements somehow feel more solid and definite, which is very reassuring and confidence boosting when churning massive forces through the drivetrain. A lot of freewheels handle it very well, but they don't have quite the same slammed-home-engagement feeling. It's not an issue for me as the heavier frame puts the majority of the bike's weight in the middle regardless.
If you have a *really* light bike, moving that weight from the middle of the bike to the rear wheel can be noticeable, but you'd get used to it quickly. Depends how fussy about weight distribution you are. It can make it a bit backwheel-heavy which some people don't seem to mind, but I find it messes up front-wheel placement/pulling up.

The main benefit over a freewheel is the dramatically reduced rolling resistance. The wheel can move much more freely since it doesn't need to always push the chain around, so you roll for longer. It feels like it rolls smoother, I guess for the same reasons.
It also means trousers are much less likely to get caught in chains (and when they do it's not so bad as they only go in as far as you pedal), if you're susceptible to that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, aener said:

If you want to roll around, definitely. If you're riding comp-ish trials, maybe.

Thanks. Well, my bike weighs 9.4kg as it is now. I run a "Der Kaiser" on the rear* so it is already a bit heavy there. I don't mind the extra weight (have lost 5kgs of weight myself over the last couple of weeks). I will run pure trials with it though so not much rolling here.

*I could run a Monty on the rear which would make up for the weight transfer from the middle to the rear.

Edited by niconj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you're suggesting changes you could make to accommodate the difference it sounds like you just want one, so get one.
Run it with the Kaiser, and if you find it makes too much of a difference change to a lighter tyre to compensate. Give yourself time to adjust though. One ride is not a proper diagnostic ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, aener said:

Well if you're suggesting changes you could make to accommodate the difference it sounds like you just want one, so get one.
Run it with the Kaiser, and if you find it makes too much of a difference change to a lighter tyre to compensate. Give yourself time to adjust though. One ride is not a proper diagnostic ;)

Kinda want one... true. Mostly because it's more reassuring than a FFW. Doesn't Jack run one on his crewkerz? Not that it'll make me ride like him. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, niconj said:

Kinda want one... true. Mostly because it's more reassuring than a FFW. Doesn't Jack run one on his crewkerz? Not that it'll make me ride like him. :D

He used too, he is now running the standard crewkerz freewheel and has been for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think YES, my ~4 years old PRO2 EVO still works fine and I never serviced it. Just feel like it's time for a new bearings, but everything else is absolutely OK and it still feels awesomely solid and sounds so loud I don't need to ask people to step aside. I don't know any other  hub as much reliable as HOPE.

Edited by NINJА
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran a Hope pro 2 EVO from when they first came out and had endless issues with it, ended up getting that changed and moving onto my 2nd Evo this one was better but still had a fault where the bearings would suddenly crack inside the hub body. I went into Hope 3 times for this until I finally got a new hub and they tested my old one, turning out to be the hub shell itself being to tight for the bearings causing them to crack. That one was a little better until 3 of 4 pawls snapped on me in a move and again back to Hope and that turned out to be the wrong pawls in the hub itself (which also happened to another friend weeks later). 

I now have the pro 4 Evo which seems to be pretty good so far I am not sure how long I have had this one I think its 8 months now. I would go for the pro 4 model. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, niconj said:

That was the plan. As soon as my Jitsie FFW gives up I will order the Hope hub. May take a while though. I have to fight my compulsive shopping. :D

It's the perfect tool for the job in my case and many others, some of the old school guys on the forum have tried and moved back to 48e. 

Just don't make the mistake I did and go for Halo spokes, every time I replace one I snap another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paperclip said:

Just don't make the mistake I did and go for Halo spokes, every time I replace one I snap another. 

It's probably not the Halo spokes* but once one spoke is broken, the ones next to it take a lot of stress as well and break easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...