Al_Fel

This is the "Really bad trials jokes thread" at least he's having a go and not just being a negative little bitch.

That's a pretty good one. All you seem to be doing is being a little bitch about it. If you don't like it don't read it.

You're not doing it right.

I'll download it in the morning. I hope Silva knocks Evans out. I do like Evans a bit more after seeing him on the Ultimate fighter but I still don't like him.

Fair enough, you clearly haven't got a clue what a stiff brake is then. Jog on yourself.

I'm sure there was a thread about that.

Over a thousand views and 80 replies seem to suggest its not that bad of a thread.

For picking on some kid?

Obviously not if they are in this thread.

I don't see you coming up with any.

Glad we sorted that one out. Yes it certainly is. (I was taking the piss with my first post)

I do get the hump quite easily on here because people seem to think they can get away with bitchy comments that they wouldn't say to your face most of the time. I'm actually a very easy going person and always up for a laugh and a joke. I just don't like people thinking they are high and mighty on this and saying something a bit nasty because they can get away with it. When I say "get away with it" I don't mean I'd slap someone if they said something like that to my face I'm totally not like that at all. I'd just say something back to them. Anyway back to the frame. What I said about it was totally aimed at you being an engineer in my retaliation for you trying to make me look like an idiot. I do think that the seat stay tubes are longer than they need to be and could make the rear brake a lot stiffer if they where shorter and the plate was welded about an inch lower down. I get the impression that Onza are just in it for the money. They seem to get a load of proto frames built up and what ever people like the look of they go for using this forum as a litmus test. I think adding to the fact they don't pay for advertising just shows how money hungry they are. I'm not saying Onza are a bad company. The whole idea is to make money. I really like some of their cheaper bikes and they are a great way of getting people into the sport. I just find that their higher end stuff isn't as well thought out and designed as it could be. I'm not saying I could do a better job either but that's why I'm not in the business of making trials parts. So basically what I'm trying to say is I "think" Onza made the frame because people showed interest in the prototype and they could sell it and make money. This is all my opinion and from what I've personally experienced. If you don't like it that's fine with me. Matt I apologise for being an arse.

I'd rather live under a rock than in a caravan.

Leave him alone this is actually quite a good thread. It makes a change to all the "what pad" topics and "i've just bought such and such is it any good?" topics.

Yeah with your dad.

What's the difference between riding in lycra and shagging a man? Shagging a man is a hell of a lot less gay.

Who the f**k is that? And what is so great about him?

I like this thread and I like this kid. He took some abuse on the chin like man. Why did the tramp sleep under the trials bike? Because it was a Koxx boxx. (f**k me that took some time to think of.)

OK.....

Have you pulled a brake on one?

I don't think you understand how jokes work mate.

Why did the Trial-Tech rim stop spinning? Because it was tired. This is so shit its fun.

I personally think its a pretty awful frame. Its ugly (not that important) and badly designed (very important). The seat stays are too long and the brake plate is far too high up and it makes the rear brake really flexy. Any half decent "engineer" would be able to see that and would avoid that frame.

To make money for onza.

Grind it.