Krisboats

You obviously don't have proper chavs then. Round here if they start anything you have to act hard yourself so they can see your not scared, but if you overdo it your in for the biggest beating of your life. With the kiddies acting hard is all well and good, they'll probably leave or give you a sarcastic comment and that'll be the end of it. But the proper devvo style ones are the ones you need to be careful around.

Yeah i thought the same. The "funny" aspect to the sector 7 guy was the main downfall i reckon. While he may have been funny in films like mr deeds where the entire film has a silly vibe to it, i can't help but feel this character seemed too daft in a movie that was trying to set itself as a beleivable action movie. Even just leaving him out and giving the other sector 7 guy (the one with the moustache and briefcase that goes to brief the secretary of defense) a bigger part would have been a lot better. Hell if i was going to cut people out the fat black computer hacker guy would have been high on my list too, the computer consultant the hot aussie bird went to meet should have been less "squealy" and american. I thought that while soundwave (midget silver transformer) needed a different personality to fit his teeny tiny body than the strong, serious guy he was before, some of the things he did were just ridiculous. For a robot that can nimbly swing through the pipes on the airplane and stealthily slide down the planes tyre, why oh why did he have to do that stupid walk past the security guards? It just wasn't neccesary or funny especially seeing as how he was trying to escape unnoticed, a cocky "i'm trying to look normal so you don't notice me" walk just didn't fit the slightly menacing ninja like approach he should have used. Bit of a geeky ramble i know, but i can't help but feel it was dumbed down with a load of poor humour for the american audiences.

no, one of them tripped over the guiderope in an act of clumsyness and as a result he slashed all the guideropes and stamped on the connecting rods that held the tent up. He did this while one of them was asleep inside

Pretty sure the guy in clip 1:02 died.

I was there a couple of weeks back. Was full of kids (13-17 years olds) who got drunk every night because the shop sold them booze at extrotionate prices... which the kids didn't mind as they didn't need I.D. Loads of fights, 4 destroyed caravans, "bouncers" slashing tents and knocking them down because there were "apparantly" knives inside that were used to threaten and mug kids earlier in the evning (we know for a fact there wasn't because we'd been with them all evening in town). Good thing though was that if you catch the bus you can get into newquay for £3 return with late night pic ups and get drunk cheaply at the bars/clubs in town and get back when the kiddies have gone to bed. Boyracer tunes blasted out the cars as well all day long. Apparantly this summer is the worst they've ever had with regards to fights, ambulances, police, riots, and caravans on fire. Pools nice though

Looks loads nicer. Or to quote that thread on OTN

Duck billed platypus's have a poisonous spine on their hind legs that they jab into predators/people and can cause blinding pain, unconsciousness and other random ailments.

Woo! Andy's back! Nice one dude, i remember you showing me a pic of your old and new pures way back then, may even still have it .

Most certainly will

Nah he dropped off that stick like building on the left of the original picture. I know its the Eiffel Tower really

Basically the same thing that Tiscali, AOL, SKY and Wanadoo have, only they call it different things... like a Fair Usage Policy. Tiscali see's it as anyone who downloads (cumulative web browsing, file-downloading, game playing etc) over 50mb of stuff between 6.00pm and 11.00pm on weeknights and 12.00-4.00pm at weekends.

Yeah, i see where your coming from... and if i'm being totally honest it didn't occur to me at all before you mentioned it then. Sorry dude :$ .

Welding it will unecessarily weaken the frame, you'd probably be better off with an adapter. There've been plenty of them made before and they seem to work quite well, in fact there was a topic not so long ago that had a diagram to show the measurements of where the mount holes and stuff should be.

Thats why i went onto explain its use of system resources in case he meant to say "vistas a system hog" or something to that effect .

Okay, hows this? "That statement was incorrect." Fact is, it doesn't "suck up your computer power". That statement in itself is incorrect as vista doesn't use any more "power" (reffering to battery life) than XP. Operating systems in general do very little with regards to power consumption when compared to running programs, having the screen on, using the speakers etc. The thing vista does is appears to use more RAM, but people get confused with this by comparing it to how XP used RAM and thinking they are both using it in the same way. Vista allocates the RAM more efficiently than in XP and when the RAM is needed by another program it gets assigned straight away, reducing the amount used by vista. The reason the RAM requirements are higher for vista is because it uses more a complex graphical interface than XP and requires the RAM for caching, as it caches far more stuff than XP does. The main culprit of the expendature of RAM is the "superfetch" feature of vista. Superfetch loads previously accessed files and programs or programs it "thinks" you might be liekly to run next in order to load them up quicker should you use them. XP never did this, which is why you could find XP ran slower at startup and even after having just left it on its own for a while. Superfetch can even prioritize what programs your likely to use at different tmies of the day and cache them accordingly, for example game .exe files in the evening and weekends and word, publisher, excel .exe files during business days. The real fact of it is not how shocking it is that vista uses up so much memory, but how previous versions of windows shockingly left it empty despite the RAM still drawing roughly the same amount of power as if it were being used as a cache. I thought i'd already been more than helpful further on in the thread and that writing something of an essay like that was a bit unneccessary when a simple answer would have sufficed for the majority of people who will read this thread. I figured if you were really concerned as to why they may be lies you'd go and look into it yourself or that the only type of people who'd want to know would be the type that already do.

I think thats the best point in this thread. I've seen countless people going out on rides and trying to tuck rather than trying to sidehop and having to tuck, purely because they think it shows they are pushing themselves. I'm pretty sure that at around 30-35 inches theres no need to tuck at all because you body is quite capable of doing that extension (except really short people or younglings) without a tuck. But people continue to go out and try tucking at that size so they fit in with this "trend" and pull themselves into the bike.

I'm sorry but... and ... are simply breathtaking. Thats a fantastic combination of such amazing rider and photographer talent that yields such brilliant results. Very nicely done !

Base TA26, Ashton, short control, short pitbull.

That was more of a teaser than a video. Theres so much editing because theres so few clips, every single clip had slo-motion added to it at some point. It was alright, but nothing really different from your others.

9 Blue pallets.

Nice one patt. Looks good dude, lots and lots of photo's to browse through

Good riding, poor music He's also reet slow at posting things out to people

You forgot the amphitheatre, which is probably the only thing you'd go to notts for. The rest isn't too good.

Lies.

Onza Carbon Risers 30": 285g Monty 221Ti Risers (old): 273g Monty 221Ti risers 07: 287g I really don't think the difference in those kind of bars is enough to warrant going for the lightest ones. Just whichever you like the price/size/feel of the most.