The fact he's been banned for a week because of something that insignificant makes it come across as arrogant. The way it comes across is that the person who banned him saw the post and fitted it to a rule and banned him, like their trying to show that you can be banned very easily should they want you to be, a form of superiority complex if you like. Which IS arrogant. Theres hundreds of posts on the forum that could be categorized as spam, yet i've never seen or heard of anything being done about it. Yet in this case, he was given the final bit of warning for a week ban. Not just a 10% warning on top of say 30% (which is quite childish still), but for the final bit to ban someone, its way beyond childish. Dave's post afterwards is simply re-inforcing how it comes across, a sarcastic piss take at the fact he's been banned for a week. I'm not saying thats what it is, but thats the way it seems to come across. It seems as though someones seen this post and jumped at the chance of banning him.