Jump to content

trials hoe

Members
  • Posts

    1331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by trials hoe

  1. i've reused olives loads of times, fair easy to bodge.

    take the olive (no hose left in it) grip it in some long nose plyers, take a cross headed screwdriver and push it into the olive and twist the screwdriver round until the hose will fit through (will need to do it to both sides). does help if you have something to press everything against like a wall...then fit again as normal (Y)

    odd one to explain, but it makes more sense when you have all the bits in front of you.

  2. how are you having the issue with chain tension? doesn't the rockman have integrated tensioners?

    if you ran it the other way up (guessing you mean tensioning the chain upwards from the dropout, above the chainstay) it'll have loads of slack when you get power on, it'll only hold tension when it's coasting or unloaded. that would make for a seriously bumhole clenching ride, but i'm probably misunderstanding what you said haha.

    good thing about spoke tensioners is that even if it gets a good bashing and no longer holds tension on the chain you can just bend it back out 'till it does (Y) or just make another...i have spokes all over the place haha I'm sure I'm not the only one.

    i found plain gauge spokes worked better than butted ones too.

  3. i was watching a vid on pootube the other day, a SFX company made a pair of scissors and they used 2 different types of the pu stuff (can't remember which ones exactly) one to keep the rigidity of the shape and one (think it was the 60a shore version of the one i got) to make them 'soft' enough to allow them "to be thrown at people in the office." i'll have a look for it in a bit, could be an option to mix in a small % of something that would be rigid enough to give the pad a more solid feel without making it too much harder shore wise.

    or i might go find a relevant forum and ask on there, someone will have had the same problem an found a solution to it.

  4. respect!

    micro balloons are stiffening up the stuff,or fiber powder

    cheers :D

    just had a look at those microballoons, sounds like they're designed towards reducing density and cost (yet to see anything about an additive reducing the amount of compression) in my head something less dense will compress more? or some kind of 'fibers' sounds like a better shout to me, a bit like chopped strand glass fiber maybe? .don't want to add anything that will affect the 'performance' of the pads grip/bite on the rim.

  5. Always wanted a Vario but couldn't afford one. Love to find one to build as a retro ride!

    i wanted one from the first time i saw it in leisure lakes, was between that and an orange zero. can't remember last time i saw one of them either haha

    did want a 24mhz back in the day too, would make a shit hot hippy hoppy fart around commuter type bike...wouldn't mind one of those still today.

    did i post those pads to you? i'm buggered if i can remember weather or not i did, i assume i did as i can't find 'em now haha

  6. bee's wax worked a treat :D rigged a quick mould (type thing) together with some g clamps and some cut up laminate floor (leftovers), just so i knew what the 70a compound was going to be like...the wait for me to get a proper mould together was going to be too long with me being an impatient twat.

    img20130608184224.jpg

    img20130608192353.jpg

    frankly i could have done a much better job, but this was more about 'knowing' than anything else.

    performance is bang-on other than the squishiness of the pad it's self, i'm aiming towards a pad for a smooth rim rather than a ground one (grind in the pic is dead) but they won't last overly long on a grind, that said for how much the mix cost vs how many pads it makes its viable to run a grind too from a cost perspective.

    anyhoo...any PU gurus on here? are there and additives i can add to the mixture before moulding to reduce the amount of compression the end product has?

    abuse opinions are welcome on my piss-poor effort :)

  7. YouTube ultra ever dry. But I've not researched whether it's available to the public/if they're still in the R&D process. It's an American company though.

    that's the stuff!, found it on amazon...damn expensive! looks like there are a few similar things about that behave like it too (super hydrophobic coatings), was looking to coat the mould with something that would act as a release agent at the same time as fixing the porous nature of a wooden mould i was planning of making...just not at that price haha

    reckon bee's wax would suffice? same as some use for fiberglass/carbon mould release agent, so i'm guessing it would work, don't want to have a mould with pads stuck in it i can't use haha

  8. how much further is everyone else? have got the pu mix stuff now after a trip to the sorting office (always grim)...

    img20130608093338.jpg

    also made a blank from plaster and found it was way to brittle to be used as a mould so that's now out of the window, was thinking of making it out of wood instead an giving it a coat of that funky laquor that nothing can stick too...if only i could remember what it was called, anyone else remember it's name and where i can get it or something similar? if it helps i saw it in a video where they coated a multitude of random objects with it then put green liquid on it, was a fascinating watch so someone must know what i'm on about :)

  9. yeah, closest i come to using mixed stuff is with glue so i'm assuming the 'demould time' is like saying touch dry with paint.

    looking to run on a smooth rim setup, not the biggest fan of grinds myself. just picked 70 as a 'that sounds about right' guide haha

    how many are having a go at this with what compounds so far?

  10. might have access to a vacum forming machine (or whatever they're called) think that might be a better option.

    the e-crap listing for the mix i'm looking at says "30 min @ 70*C" and "60 min @ room temp" so 4 hours might be a bit too long haha unless it differs form each companies ingredients if your directions say different :P

  11. yeah, make them for the biggest fit backings, then cut them down for others sounds like the right approach (Y)

    i've measured everything up, i plan on making a negative out of wood, then make a mould from that with some of the 2 part mix stuff, then use that as the mould and will still have an original negative to make another from if i ruin it...which probably will haha

    not sure if i should go for a harder or softer compound mix than the pad material for the mould it's self yet though.

  12. snip

    have you measured all the recess area of the backing/pad?

    i'm looking into getting some of the 2 part mix stuff, making a mould but i measured my pads/backing at 7mm (internal with of recess of backing and external of the pad) then looked on tarty and they say 8mm. i don't have any other backings to measure for reference and don't want to make pads that'll only fit my backings, just unsure if i have odd pads and backings :ermm: (unsure what they are got them from the f/s on here, will attach a pic if someone could identify them for definite that would be cool :) )

    also i worked out the area:weight of my pad and the 250g (x2) mix i'm going to get about 70 pads from the lot with 10mm of material (by my maths*, so it'll probably be way off :P)

    don't want to make X amount of pads the wrong size so if anyone can clear up the size (width) flap i've found my self in, that'd be cool...then i can crack on making a mould (Y)

    post-30295-0-21544300-1370197430_thumb.j

  13. when i did engineering at college (had to start at the bottom on an nvq, then to a gnvq and then a btec) i was told that the associated qualifications included in the course (applied science and maths for engineering, communications ect.) were the 'equivalent' to an a level qualification (for the btec) in the same area (science, maths and english), never quite understood what was meant by 'equivalent' an never got a straight answer either.

    so they were probably pulling my leg and trying to make me feel better as i have no gcse's, then laughing at me behind my back :P

  14. i thought it was down to the cranks? if your fw was eccentric all its internals would fall out at the loose point surely?

    if the threads are cut at a different time to the splines the threaded section could easily be eccentric to the splines causing the issues with chain tension. the sl fw i've had on 3 different sets of cranks have all had a different amount of loose-tight movement.

    also i set up at the tight point too, just so its not too tight and make do with it. the tight point on mine is right foot forward so there is no slack when hopping around. must be a pain for the lefty guys having a flappy chain, assuming everyone else has the tight spot right foot forward, all mine have been....

  15. thought thats the boat i'd be in, the rm carbons i have are bang-on other than not having enough rise now i'm on a 24 again. seems rockman have come a fair way recently too, stepping into the carbon fork game....they need to put a disc mount option on the stock ones though :-

    yeah the tt's are a safe bet, just want to avoid having all the same stuff on my bike as everyone else. guess it's take a punt time, i'd rather have a bit of variety on my bike parts wise.

  16. so i'm looking into getting some bars with bit more rise, anyone tried the rockmans? trialtech are the safe option, with 1* of sweep and like a gram between them on paper they 'should' feel pretty similar to ride.

    the last alu rockman bars i had (silver rockbars) were a bit on the floppy side, it used to do my head in...wondering if the new ones are best avoided too.

    which would you go for? ideally someone will have some rockmans and can comment on weather they're any good or not.

    cheers :)

    chris

  17. it seems like the only testing that goes on is very secretive and none of the results from the testing are released, and im pretty sure people would like to know how things went with the tests that they did, rather than the only things that you ever find out about the testing of new parts is just utterly random chinese whispers on random forums!

    products on there are the older ones, but if deng was using stress/strain analysis on 3d modeling software then, he probably is now....

    http://www.echobike.com/

    click the 'design' bit on the left.

    also you mention that manufactures should put an estimated usage time info with their products (a warranty kind of gives you a clue), this would be pointless.....something would last me a million times longer than the same part would last damon for example......

    i'd rather see a topic like this with a description of how long they lasted and how/what they rode, if they lasted 6 months doing chasm style drop-gaps and suffering a multitude of bashing then i'd draw my own conclusion from that...

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...