JT!

The interesting thing is, the white snow reflects the suns light. So when you get total snow coverage over 100% of the country, the temp plummets because there's less heat from the sun effecting the temperature. And then because it's so cold, the snow stays longer.

Pics or it didn't happen.

You can read the rules to this forum as many times as you like, but to know exactly what you should and shouldn't be posting you just have to wait until you're mocked by the rest of the forum and learn from it. I guess it's kind of a 'you don't know where the line is until you cross' it kind of thing. So yeah I guess if you're not willing to spend 20 seconds looking at the types of topics that are acceptable here then you might as well quit while you're behind.

This is the worst attempt at spam I've ever seen. Topic was already at the top so don't bitch at me for bumping.

Did you move the original files or rename them?

Seal it with you arsecheek when using the bath.

Is your house hard to find?

I know it gets frequently colder than -10c here, but to be actually riding in anything below that is just silly.

I would do this by comparing the gradient of z {(7, P), where P is the Bath Profit} with the tangent vectors to the constraints pointing at the optimum point: (1,0) from b≤10 and (-7,11) from 11a+7b≤100. So long as the gradient forms less than a right angle with these tangent vectors, it is pointing into the same corner as before: (1,0) • (7,P) > 0 and (-7,11) • (7,P) > 0. I'm too lazy to look up "slack variables" (the above in disguise?), but the above method works so long as as everything is linear. However, for more than 2 dimensions, those tangent vectors are the vectors along the 1-dimensional edges between vertices: intersections of several constraints.

Nevermind, has the /forum/ link saved.

I keep getting this.

I wonder if it was the same person...

Didn't this happen to someone else a couple of months ago? Someone used a wrong address by mistake.

Couldn't access the site for a couple of mins just now.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountain_bike_trials

True, I'm just bitching for bitching sake. I'll stop now.

Considering Pedobear is the new SM avatar trend. Not only is it not against the rules but it's an encouraged area of discussion.

Oh, didn't know that. But the point still stands in my last post. Also, you said "I might bookmark that so next time you're complaining about horrifying double standards on here I can point that one out for you". By not warning me, but warning Matt, isn't that a double standard? So referring back to this is only going to strengthen my point about double standards on the forum?

Yeah but it does bring up a flaw in the system. You'd have thought mods would be able to see any edits, especially when dealing with the forsale section. You could put anything in the description, sell it, then edit it. And when the guy complains about spokes missing from his wheel, check the description. It says quite clearly there's spokes missing and there's nothing that can be done about it.

Is it actually shown what was alleged to have been there before my edit, or are you just going by what people were reporting?

*you'd

But being a smartass isn't breaking the forum rules.

I know, can't believe I spelled thread wrong, changed it now though.

That's what Davina used to do on Don't Try This At Home.

I know what this thread needs!