joshywa Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 i know that tensile and middleburn are pretty much the dogs bollox wen it comes to cranks, i jus spent £80 on a set of middleburn rs7 pro trials , very cheap :huh::P , but what makes them any better than try-all or powerpro cranks?? jus incase this dsn make much sense or i hav gotten most of the info wrong..i apologise cheers boumsong not much in fact i'd put try-all cranks up with middle burns but as far as "what makes them better than power pro's" it's probably the extra strength and aesthetic (looks) value that burns have >_< enjoy your new cranks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walleee Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 (edited) I cant back it up, but I know more PowerPro cranks have snaped than Middleburn's, and its nothing to do with the fact that FSA have sold more cranks than Middleburn......(if they have?) MiddleBurns are the bench mark as far as im concerned for trial use. Edited December 5, 2005 by jake1516 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeCottTrials Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 burns just have that magic glow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevecoust Posted December 7, 2005 Report Share Posted December 7, 2005 i know that tensile and middleburn are pretty much the dogs bollox wen it comes to cranks, i jus spent £80 on a set of middleburn rs7 pro trials , very cheap :P:P , but what makes them any better than try-all or powerpro cranks?? jus incase this dsn make much sense or i hav gotten most of the info wrong..i apologise cheers boumsong middleburn are genrally great quality :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.