Jump to content

dave85

Senior Member
  • Posts

    2259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dave85

  1. the arguments will start when the tgs riders start to mock natural, generally from what ive seen anyway

    On the whole, the TGS lot couldnt win an argument if their lives depended on it, it just degenerates to threats.

  2. Looks like we'll have to split the engine and box to get it out the bottom, there's a crossmember in the way of the bellhousing. Bellhousing bolts look a twat to get to as well so it'll be easier to lift it out.

  3. There are at least 4 brand name Hubs this year that are using 120clicks engagement system, and none of them are trials specific. Halo super DJ (dirt jump) hub is latest addition to join the 120click hub club. Chris King, Hope, and Middleburn, seemed to be either slow on the uptake, or not bothered of developing a super high engagement hub. maybe these companies are just waiting to see how these hubs perform long term.

    It's diminishing returns though isnt it? I noticed a nice difference between 16, 21 and 72 engagment points, I'm not sure I'd be so impressed going to 120 point.

    All three firms you name, or the first two at least, have strong, reliable mechanisms. This one has a couple of fairly dubious points, and needs to be made with greater accuracy, so it's going to be expensive. Doesnt really strike me as worth changing to this mechanism for the small benefits.

  4. The pigments that are used in urethane based brake pads (essentially all the trials pads) is inconsequential to braking performance. Sort of like food coloring in icing on a cake.

    The black color in a tire (tyre for you all....ha, ha, ha) is carbon, and is there to improve wear. It does make a difference to the compounds performance.

    In summary, don't confuse black in a rubber tire with pigment in a urethane based trials brake pad. This might have been the source of confusion.

    I'm not confusing it,and do know about carbon black and rubber vulcanisation, but I've seen 2 pairs of pads, both made from the same compound but with different pigments, give completely different performances. I accept it isnt a truly scientific observation, but how can something mixed within a material not make a difference?

  5. CRMS are a bit on the soft side (though do not confuse the hardness with wear life) at 92 Shore A. Plazmatic PMGs are the other end of things at 92.

    And just to clear the air. I found this on a website:

    "- 10th anniversary Limited Edition brake pads from Plazmatic, in the same compound as the CRMs*."

    followed by "*This is according to the importer, however we have not tested these pads ourselves just yet - an update when we have!"

    This leads one to believe there is some question as to the honesty of the importer (and ultimatly manufacturers) claim. That might not have been the intent, but there is not really any other way of reading that series of statements. As each time other makers change a color, I do not see a similar caviat placed in the product description. Yes indeed it is the exact same compound, only difference is lack of pigment (yellow).

    Isn't a pigment part of the compound though? I would infer from that sentance that the pads may not work the same, not that the manufacturer is telling lies.

  6. Smooth rims always, some people have ceramic coated rims but never a grind. Maguras develop huge braking force at speed, even in the wet they're more than powerful enough with kool-stop pads.

  7. The thing with the King it operates on one spring doesn't it? So if that spring decides to fail then there is no backup like another pawl with spring underneath.

    The helical splines hold the two driverings together. If the spring does fail, engagment will be a bit sketchy and you'll know about it, but it shouldnt dump you on your arse.

×
×
  • Create New...