dan more Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 whats better 20 or 26 inch this really annoys me people argue about what is better and i don't get it they both do exactly the same don't they whats so bad about the size of your wheels does this annoy any one else or is it just me dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fvil Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 20 is more fun and better. also the parts are now more common so its all very easy to repair or upgrade26 is hard and more challengeinp.s i m sure there was a topic before talkin about this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 this thread makes me unhappy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebelistic Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 this thread makes me unhappyPlease search the forum before posting a new topic as this question has been asked loads of times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willsey Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 i was going to say the same thing as Ash lol.. maybe someone should make a pined topic showing the pros an cons of mods and stocks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan more Posted August 16, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 sorry guys slipped my mind to search before posting dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash-Kennard Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 dont bother searching, click on my thread up the top Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted August 16, 2006 Report Share Posted August 16, 2006 It depends on what you want to ride. 26 for street, 20 for natural. Got 2 bikes at the moment and I far more enjoy riding a stock, it's so much easier and more fun! But on natural it's only a 20" bike. A stock is clumsy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padarik Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 might just be down to each persons own opinion. but i'm sure this question has been asked a fir bit just search first thanks padarik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carnagr Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 It depends on what you want to ride. 26 for street, 20 for natural. Got 2 bikes at the moment and I far more enjoy riding a stock, it's so much easier and more fun! But on natural it's only a 20" bike. A stock is clumsy.That's fairly true. Oftentimes stocks are just too long for a rock, and you can get on it and reverse wedge it on a mod, but on a stock you have to do some real trickery to get around it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minicrack Posted August 17, 2006 Report Share Posted August 17, 2006 (edited) This is a very pointless topic and can cause a lot of tension between people. It's like starting a topic on what came frist the chicken or the egg. For exmaple i would Personally say 20'' is best, but some one else would say 26'' is beter. (it never ends!) Basically i would suggest people not make these sort of topics there not that good, only cause conflict. People should just go with what they personally prefer weather it be 20''or 26'' Neither one is better than the other. You do the same things on both types of bikes, the only difference being in size and the 20'' may suit small people and a 26'' for tall people. Edited August 17, 2006 by minicrack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.