Muel

Hmmm that's true, didn't think of it like that. I guess the likelihood of someone finding that after 27 years of festering in a facebook album somewhere is lower than your Mum getting it out every once in a while. Post the pic. Part of my view on the whole thing os that if someone isn't yet old enough to decide whether information about them should be available to anyone on any source, then you should wait until they are old enough.

I don't plan on having kids (which probably explains a lot). Just cannot see how not pissing yourself is such an achievement that your family/friends need informing? Doubt it, because I couldn't accept it if my parents had pasted me all over the internet as a child for all the random people they met in a club once to see, even if every document I'd ever got was emailed to me. How can anyone want their lives to be that publically accessible? Fact is, people do look back through photos, I do because it's interesting and I know (vaguely) people who often say they do. They call it "facebook stalking" and it's some kind of hobby for some. My feed is well managed, but the fact is that people I like have children or are tagged in pissy posts that come up on my feed, and I can't block my friends or their spouses. I cannot escape the piss. How is a physical album more permanent than online? It comes out once at christmas to 10 people at the most, it doesn't reside online until someone removes it for hundreds of people to see (Unless you're a social leper with no mates). It's also not backed up or anything (usually), whereas facebook has many backups. Anyway, this discussion has gone on long enough over a bit of none existant piss... This is the angry thread, and is supposed to be for venting, not analysing the validatity of my anger. Don't stop being proud of your children or posting about it online (if it makes you happy), just don't get pissy (haha!) when I vent about it somewhere unrelated. It's ok that I'm sick of reading about a lack of piss in your kids' pants, promise.

I have seen it and my prediction was correct. It is very gay.

Because those things don't contain a child not drenched in urine. I don't post videos of myself doing something, with the title "Look at me doing the thing! I haven't pissed myself!" I get wound up about the piss. I don't want to know about piss, or lack of piss. Why can't parents be proud of their children for doing things, rather than not failing to be basic humans? I didn't go to work today and get a gold star for being devoid of excrement, why do they deserve praise? If you look deeper, remember the baby book your Mum used to get out once a year which contained all your embaressing photos? Well for todays kiddies it's on the internet forever. I very much doubt they will be cool with that when they're old enough to make the decisions.

The next round of "ooh look my kid is so amazing" posts are appearing on Facebook, as all the little shitlings are starting school. Seen two mothers now posting publically about how proud they are that their offspring had a whole entire day without pissing themselves. Not sure how that's something to be proud of personally...

"Heller, this is eh videor abaht how t' bleed yorr brek"

Long way round was awesome, even though I dislike those poncey woofters. Long way down was great, but less awesome.

Lots of stressy things in my life at the moment has resulted in me going away a lot and going for big rides on my bike, and I've used £225 of fuel on a month, which is at least 3 times as much as I usually spend. (It does 50mpg and I walk to work, so £225 is a lot).

Pfft, yolo.

The card my brother got me for my bday. Scarily accurate!

You're in a big metal health and safety shelter, you'll be fine. My dickhead brother was in his dickhead mate's car in a big b*****d crash the other day and barely got a scratch. In angry news, I am 24 today. I have memories from last week of being 17 and rebuilding motorbike engines every day. Now I have a gas bill and I'm all wound up because my contents insurance has run out.

Nahhhh, I got morals.

I got to within half an inch of pinching a random womans arse yesterday, because she had blue jeans and an orange waterproof on and therefore looked like my girlfriend from behind. I only stopped myself when I spottwmy girlfriend about 5 paces ahead of this random lady. Happy that didn't go wrong!

Niceee, bet you've been giving that some stick haha.

Fingers crossed aye. I did a track day today on my smokey, clattery old VT. Still the best bike in the world, only now the tyres are all grainy.

Everyone and everything is gayer than me.

In between sitting around, drinking coffee, chatting to my mates, popping to the shops, watching the news, playing popmaster on Radio 2 (I am appauling, still not got more than 10 points), I occasionally test some software.

Good times. How much do you reckon you'll want for it?

I couldn't disagree more with you there. It's needed more now than ever because the volume of retards, spammers and scammers is vastly higher now. We used to have a filter against scum of all kinds when there were 5000 members, now there is no filter and 22,000 members. It clearly hasn't and doesn't work.

Hush your noise and get grafting you bloody peasant.

Yeh true, not worth the risk really. I want to phone them anyway as I'm considering selling this bike on and getting a Revere 650 instead. They're just better in every way and my VT burns oil, which isn't ideal.

I'm not sure I had to tell them either... Pretty certain I didn't have to mention the mileage on the bike, as I struggle to remember it.

Ahh right, to be honest I only skim read in here, only asked as I fancy a 172 myself one day.

Bit of advice please chaps. When I insured my bike I put the estimated mileage at 3000 miles, but I've had it 4 months and done over 4000 miles. By the time the year is out I could have easily done 10k. If I crash or anything, will I get in trouble for it? As far as I know they've got no idea of knowing how many miles it had done when I started the policy right?

Clio? Didn't you used to rate the Clio 172/182 very highly?