-
Posts
2050 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by ilikeriding
-
beast, how come you cut the preloads or bounces out of the static stuff
-
wow that line at 4:30 was so flowing, your really quite smooth
-
ah ha this is much more clear, I thought there was a general meaning to the whole of the end part of the video, and that may have been something like: although onlookers see trials as being a bit freaky, the rider is still one of those onlookers and therefore is the same, my interpretation based upon posts I have read of yours is that is was going to be something unnecessarily profound, meaningful if interpreted in certain ways but at the same time a little broad, so that is what I came up with. So imagine the meaning was as I just stated and you had created those images ect, in order to portray that meaning. Then imagine if someone else had done exactly the same thing and you hadn't, you could (most likely would) interpret if differently. I think this would be because of the difference in situation. When creating something you would have thoughts/ideas that cause you to make it in that way and therefore to perceive it in that way, when interpreting something you do not have the same thoughts as you would not be the one creating, it would be a different time so your thoughts and feelings that affect decision would differ. This means that if someone had the same perceptual filter as you and they interpreted the material of your creation they would not come to the same conclusion as to what it means or it is unlikely. From what I have said I don't think language would play a part in this as it would just be used to convey the differing proposed meanings but I'm not sure how close my example was to your intention so what I have said may not apply to what you have done. I hope this clears things up a little and the last part of the first paragraph isnt some sort of insult lol, just an opinion that may have affected my thinking
-
Ok well I don't feel that is to the point in terms of my point maybe I'm just thick but I still feel that your mini experiment is flawed in that way, I don't mean to sound like a dick or anything but I felt like I had to say this, maybe if you put it more simply i would understand better although I am a tad drunk so i need some jaffacakes once again mint vid
-
well yeah it was rushed, he didn't drop the front low enough on the edge, weight wasnt far enough back, didnt land with his weight evenly, looked like he sort of slipped off it respect for trying though its hard to do all that stuff when your shitting it
-
love it! geo looks like I'd like it, Id give it a go if it weighed less than my adamant does it bunnyhop well? would like to see a video of you on it tim EDIT: whoa just looked at the price
-
would have been better if they looked into trials a bit more but a good attempt I suppose, not sure about the whole man vs machine thing, a random person cant just get on a trials bike and be instantly good which is kind of what they portray
-
uphill gardening
-
wow that was awesome. very good rider. as to the last bit of the video, how could you find out whether you have the same perceptual filter as people when you created the material that is being interpreted by you and others, surley if someone else made that and showed it to you it could mean a whole number of things. Your perception of it may have changed if you didnt know the intentions of the creator.
-
his hooks are crazy its like a boon from hook position
-
good because it doesnt matter if you bend your front wheel but bad because theyere verry flexxy although they are really powerful when set up right
-
that was good, have you got a much better video of you when you are going big?
-
big dropgap, you have balls
-
for something to be made an offical record you have to have guiness world record personell there to get the current one changed which i assume is the top video someone else has to do that
-
once you do learn the basic's its probably best not to go soley for getting stuff bigger, try and do things smoothley, keeping the bike under control, it will pay off long term
-
sick im going to try that
-
hmm yeah i think new bars/ stem maybe the answer these adamant ones are a bit shitty they feel really narrow even though they are the same lenght as the zoo's and whatnot, thing is with changing the stem a shorter one makes the bike feel heavier although i have only tried some short onza thing
-
Ok im bored of my adamant 07 long the setup is a fairly long stem and adamant bars, it feels really nice on the back wheel, easy on the arms but it doesn't feel like you can put much power down. I want something that you can just kick and go far without thinking about technique so much. I used to have an 07 pitbull and this has some of what im looking for but it never felt that great on the back wheel. so basically a low bb frame long chainstays i assume would be nice for gapping, but is there anything that feels really comfortable and spacious on the back wheel that fits this description?
-
not bad, this dicks on everything though http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=mjaIxuZ126g
-
whats the difference
-
mish on
-
hmm I have a theory about skinny jeans, because they are so tight you cant tuck loads so after learning to ride good with them (not tucking so much) then a change to normal jeans or whatever means you can tuck more and go higher of course all of this means nothing if you choose to tuck loads and hang ur whole ass out.
-
your only saying that because you agree with grant i cant be bothered to sit here and type out all the reasons for my opinion
-
some opinions are right, mine is right