Jump to content

Gear Ratio Converter


br3n

Recommended Posts

You might be thinking of the one I made a while ago and uploaded. But now Imageshacks being cack, so I'm re-uploading it to photobucket as I speak, shall edit when done. (Y)

You might be thinking of the one I made a while ago and uploaded. But now Imageshacks being cack, so I'm re-uploading it to photobucket as I speak. Hear you go, if this is what you're after:

Ratios.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you dont need a convertor or anything confusing like that at all Bren!

just divide the front cog by the rear......

22:19 = 1.158

22:18 = 1.22

22:17 = 1.29

20:18 = 1.11

20:17 = 1.17

20:16 = 1.25

18:15 = 1.20

18:16 = 1.125

16:14 = 1.14

thats all the most common gears i can think of, and its far easier than using a silly convertor!

personally, from those, i think the best are 22:19, 20:17, 18:16, and 16:14. they all seem about right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you dont need a convertor or anything confusing like that at all Bren!

just divide the front cog by the rear......

22:19 = 1.158

22:18 = 1.22

22:17 = 1.29

20:18 = 1.11

20:17 = 1.17

20:16 = 1.25

18:15 = 1.20

18:16 = 1.125

16:14 = 1.14

thats all the most common gears i can think of, and its far easier than using a silly convertor!

personally, from those, i think the best are 22:19, 20:17, 18:16, and 16:14. they all seem about right.

Dont know if you looked at the "silly" converter I posted Prawnie but it has a very useful feature that the above doesnt.

Tells you how far the bike will travel for 1 pedal rev and also takes into acount two other important factors, wheel size and crank length.

Useful for 24 and 20's

But each to their own :P

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just go 18/17 thats the best

no it isnt.

gear ratio is all down to personal preference really, although, that said, MOST people will find 18:17 FAR too easy..... i rode porters ashton with 18:17 and it was stupid..... so light and flicky for gaps, but SO spinny for anything with speed.

chris: didnt look at your sheldon convertor, as ive only ever needed my way :P

ive only ever run 170mm cranks, and a 26'' wheel, so i only ever need to work out equivalent ratios for my otherwise unchanged bike, as is probably the case for most people.

really wanting to try 18:16 soon with a heatsink bash, but dont know if itll be a TINY bit too easy, i know 18:15 will be too hard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you dont need a convertor or anything confusing like that at all Bren!

just divide the front cog by the rear......

22:19 = 1.158

22:18 = 1.22

22:17 = 1.29

20:18 = 1.11

20:17 = 1.17

20:16 = 1.25

18:15 = 1.20

18:16 = 1.125

16:14 = 1.14

thats all the most common gears i can think of, and its far easier than using a silly convertor!

personally, from those, i think the best are 22:19, 20:17, 18:16, and 16:14. they all seem about right.

thats how i do it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...