ZHI_Chris Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boswell Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.trial_dude Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 first one looks a bit like the hydroxx( at the seatstays) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike W Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 They both look really good, the first one looks a bit erm sharp...Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 The first one has an integrated anal plug? I'm sure they meant integrated booster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
future orange 660 Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 the first looks like it has little room for a wheel.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason222 Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 What's the Geo of the 26" frame? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Wood Posted November 1, 2007 Report Share Posted November 1, 2007 Look like trials frames? More importantly, what are the weights gonna be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusevelt Posted November 2, 2007 Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 Er why would the makers of JOB Magnesium trials frames wanna change the geometry of their debut 1st generation frames? and why show a cgi pic of a frame that isnt available? better off showing the frames for real...if they plan to exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZHI_Chris Posted November 2, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 Er why would the makers of JOB Magnesium trials frames wanna change the geometry of their debut 1st generation frames? and why show a cgi pic of a frame that isnt available? better off showing the frames for real...if they plan to exist.the real frame will come soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Token Posted November 2, 2007 Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 Disc mounts!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Rainbird Posted November 2, 2007 Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 Geo?1070, +20, 380, 72 with disc and vee mounts would be about perfect right now, as I have a horrible feeling nasty things are happening with my BB shell...These going to be the same price as the previous set? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted November 2, 2007 Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 and why show a cgi pic of a frame that isnt available? better off showing the frames for real...if they plan to exist.Come on, when Deng released information on the 2007 frames, most pics were rendered using a CAD program. It sure gives you a better idea of the shape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Garland Posted November 2, 2007 Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 I hope they are at least 1080 wb, then maybe with the right top tube length they would feel nice. The others were too short. If they turn out to be longer I may well purchase one, its that or a Triton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigjames Posted November 3, 2007 Report Share Posted November 3, 2007 Geo?1070, +20, 380, 72 with disc and vee mounts would be about perfect right now, as I have a horrible feeling nasty things are happening with my BB shell...These going to be the same price as the previous set?now that sounds about perfect to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.