Jump to content

Why Do You Use A Square Taper Bb?


spider

Recommended Posts

I´ve never used Square, but my mate had some square´s one time. They wasent near as good as my ISIS

The only difference as long as you keep the bolts tight on a square taper is that it has much stronger and longer lasting bearings than on an ISIS bb. How can that not make it nearly as good? :S

As for axle strength, ISIS bb axles are hollow down the centre as far as Im aware (though I always run square taper so...), so how can they be stronger than a solid single axle as used in a square taper bb.....? I thought common sense would put that the other way round personally!

If any companies made them suitable for trials, we'd all be using Hollowtech II / Type-X BB/crank assemblies anyway, as they are a damn sight stiffer than both ISIS and square taper, and the external bearing races make them much easier to fit and replace!

Shimano Saint or RF Diabolus would be sweet for trials if they made them the right width to be used, which Im not aware they do (feel free to correct me please). Shame really, they're both stupidly strong!

M@

Edited by MadChikken
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ISIS interface is inherently stiffer, and allows for the use of a larger diameter axle to increase strength. Unfortunately however, the larger axle means there is less room for bearings, so in most situations the load capacity of the BBs are reduced, or they don't last as long, or both. Various methods have been devised to prevent this, such as the external bearing BBs, although the mentioned SKFs seem the best on the market at the moment.

You are right about the actual taper causing problems over time. Square taper cranks work on a fully tapered interface, you can just keep going if the crank becomes slightly loose, wheres the ISIS taper has a much shallower angle, and actually has a stop, so unlike square tapers which you can keep forcing when the taper wears a little, the isis cranks push on and stop at a set point. If any play develops, which it can after a lot of use (accelerated by multiple removal of cranks) then there is no way of getting rid of it, the taper is permanently damaged. I've seen this happen to a few cranks, including middleburns. you undo the crank bolt and you can just slide the crank off, no need for an extractor.

Square has been around almost forever, and i think it will have its place for a long time to come yet, its simple, cheap, universally known and easy to maintain.

ISIS is a great solution for the more extreme ends of biking nowadays, which inherently have shorter lifespans on high stress parts such as cranks any way, so you may be able to justify the reduced longevity for the extra strength.

ISIS are more expensive as the Tapers profile is harder to manufacture, it is a more complicated shape and has to be made to a higher tolerance than square taper cranks.

As for axle strength, ISIS bb axles are hollow down the centre as far as Im aware (though I always run square taper so...), so how can they be stronger than a solid single axle as used in a square taper bb.....? I thought common sense would put that the other way round personally!

M@

the thicker axle gives the strength, yes they are hollow to save weight. this tube structure is equally strong, if not stronger than the thin solid axle of a square taper- put a torque through a pringles tube and feel how stiff it is, now do the same with a smarties tube, as its thinner, its will twist more easily and colapse.

some manufactureres are however making the walls of the axles too thin. Also lx and xt squre taper BBs have hollow axles, so a deore or lower un52/53 is better specced for trials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thicker axle gives the strength, yes they are hollow to save weight. this tube structure is equally strong, if not stronger than the thin solid axle of a square taper- put a torque through a pringles tube and feel how stiff it is, now do the same with a smarties tube, as its thinner, its will twist more easily and colapse.

Good way of getting the point across only you'd need a solid smarties tube to see the comparison between ISIS/square.

Personally I've used square for years but I am getting more tempted by ISIS mainly as I do see them as being stronger. But then again one snapped axle in over 10 years of riding isn't bad.

I think at the moment the best option is an Echo external bearing bb as it seems like the best/longest lasting option over other ISIS bbs.

Although if Middleburn started making Type x/Hollowtech II cranks I think they'd be onto a winner. Or if frame designers switched to Spanish size bbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, i know. im just trying to ge the point across that an axle need not be solid to retain strength! the central part really does very little, especially the larger you go. As a square taper axle is so thin, it beifits form being solid. An ISIS axle is twice the diameter, would just be silly if it was solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...