Badboy Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 http://www.smart.com/-snm-0156420588-11631...f50kwcdi%2epageYeah! i think i win. 1.5 cdi. non turbo. 68bhp. Woop! (i think until i am corrected on some point of the conditions?)If its a 1.5lt engine then it would need to be 150bhp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 100bhp per litre, therefor you lose, very badly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted January 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 end of the day, for those who are interested, it's a bit of fun lol. The answer ain't fun, finding the answer may be thoguh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flipkickbs Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 100bhp per litre, therefor you lose, very badly. So i do, very badly Should have posted in the drunk thread this morning to save embarresment now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 http://www.smart.com/-snm-0156420588-11631...f50kwcdi%2epageYeah! i think i win. 1.5 cdi. non turbo. 68bhp. Woop! (i think until i am corrected on some point of the conditions?)Hahaha, were you being serious? That was hillarious, you seemed so sure of yourself despite having completely missed the whole entire point of the comeptition, I love it, you legend!Davey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flipkickbs Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 Hahaha, were you being serious? That was hillarious, you seemed so sure of yourself despite having completely missed the whole entire point of the comeptition, I love it, you legend!DaveyYea, i think the '1' infront of the .5 kinda ruined it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
granty Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 ah volvo v40 t4 1.9 200 bhp but it has a turbo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caleb Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 a human? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted January 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 a human?thats right caleb, there is a human with the power of 200 horses... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flipkickbs Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 thats right caleb, there is a human with the power of 200 horses...called Jean Claude Van Damme. (jcvd) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted January 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 called Jean Claude Van Damme. (jcvd)he's a gay dwarf... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flipkickbs Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 he's a gay dwarf...But with the power of 200 horses you wouldnt go calling him that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 Haha, Bongo, I will literally wet myself if after all this you post your answer and it turns out to have a turbo of not be European or something, that would be priceless!Davey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guineasmithpig Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 new clio sport is rumoured to have 100bhp per tonne. though i guess we ain't close enough to a saloon with that the search continues......aha!!!!!do i get this one?!BMW Alpina D3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 (edited) new clio sport is rumoured to have 100bhp per tonne. though i guess we ain't close enough to a saloon with that the search continues......aha!!!!!do i get this one?!BMW Alpina D3We're after 100bhp per litre not per tonne, who mentioned tonnes, haha, people are having severe difficulty with reading simple directives this morning, lol!!Davey Edited January 12, 2007 by Small_Gear_Big_Style Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted January 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 Haha, Bongo, I will literally wet myself if after all this you post your answer and it turns out to have a turbo of not be European or something, that would be priceless!Daveywho said i have the answer.... i made the thread, thats all!But with the power of 200 horses you wouldnt go calling him that?i'll just place my hand on the top of his head and hold him off at arms length while he swings wildy not being able to reach me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 Tell you what though, he's only gone and cracked it, that BMW Alpina D3 counts, gotta be a winner!Davey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brisa Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 Underneath, there’s Alpina-tuned suspension, and under the bonnet a larger Garrett turbocharger and intercooler, bigger injectors and reprogrammed engine management. Together they raise the output of the 2-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel from 161bhp to 197bhp. That’s a pretty remarkable figure for a 2-litre diesel, though as with all diesels it’s less than half the story. Torque swells by 51lb ft to an extremely pumped-up 302lb ft at just 2000rpm.Afraid Not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted January 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 i almost had an apprenticeship with garretts making turbochargers before i worked for BT. 5 minutes from my house is where they are made . Not that anybody gives a shit!I like the way everyone gets it right, then realises not! It's f**kin hard innit! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 Has anyone considered the possibility that there is no such car, that Japanese engineers are the only people who have managed it? I mean we have managed it but not below about 2 litres!Davey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Bleech Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 A 1992 Mercedas 190E in red... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONGO Posted January 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 A 1992 Mercedas 190E in red...are the red ones faster?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smo™ Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 are the red ones faster?! Only with the go-fasters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 (edited) Only with the go-fasters.Ooh careful, we're looking for normally aspirated cars, that counts as tuning!Davey Edited January 12, 2007 by Small_Gear_Big_Style Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Bleech Posted January 12, 2007 Report Share Posted January 12, 2007 are the red ones faster?! yes red paint has a lower coefficient of fiction than any other colour, therefore there is less wind resistance and thus I have proven that red cars are faster through the magic of science.....maybe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.