Jump to content

showurcolours

Members
  • Posts

    506
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by showurcolours

  1. And you're no better for judging me I'm entitled to my opinion and that is my opinion, I don't like fat people. Simples.
  2. Snip How anyone can abuse their body soo bad is beyond me, it's even worse when they make up shit excuses for it like "Oh I don't know how I got this big" or "it's not my fault"... Well clearly it bloody is your fault and I'm going to guess that it has something to do with your ridiculous diet and lack of exercise. Scientifically though, the whole children obesity epidemic thing is complete bullshit propaganda. We ran the statistics and looked at the research methods whilst I was at uni and it's actually only more like 17% not a 1/3rd or half. Also Muel, don't post something from the telegraph saying that they cost less than healthy people, because that is ridiculous on every level. Fat people are a massive (no pun intended haha) burden to society and the NHS considering that fat people are more likely to develop CHD (coronary heart disease), Type 2 diabetes and be at a further risk of strokes and infarctions - that's just scientific fact, not some f**k wit reporters two cents. What really buggs me though is this new talk of taxing sugary drinks - How about f**k off ! Why should every other person who enjoys sugary drinks have to pay extra because some bloody beached whales can't control their diet. It's actually discrimination, factoring weightism and if the government allow that then I shall propose that I be allowed to throw burgers at fat people. I think it's only fair
  3. How far you got? I've done all easy and intermediate on hard now. Starting the advanced off ;D
  4. I was gonna say I don't like the way that bar is pointing!
  5. Had my bike set up perfectly, let one guy ride it and now I gotta adjust the brakes all over again. That will teach me

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. dannytrialskid

      dannytrialskid

      Get em down there when I have my brakes sorted. Show em how it's done ;) Was that Liam kid from Halfords there?

    3. showurcolours

      showurcolours

      Yeah man, been riding with him most days. Been pretty decent actually, there's a shit load of us who ride street at night now; so plenty of people for you to show off in front of ;)

    4. dannytrialskid

      dannytrialskid

      siiiiik might come say hi

  6. I'm 6ft, I ride a 24" without a ridiculous stem or bar angle and I'm fine. So no, imo it's probably not too small Then again, it's pretty subjective
  7. Well, you are though cus otherwise you ain't gonna go anywhere. Yeh the issue I have is my balance point isn't quite right just yet and when I lean back, the pressure on the pedals just throws the front wheel up more. Out of interest, would you say 'perfecting' the manual and fakie individually first would help me learn this trick quicker? Also Ali, what is it actually called cus I'm just guessing haha - cheers though dude
  8. You make it sound so simple! But yeah ahaha I don't wanna call a technicality but I think if you pedal then it's technically a wheelie
  9. Haha I know! I desperately need one of the riders from the 24tour to see this and grant me the skills and wisdom that I seek
  10. Hey guys, Firstly, not sure if it's even called a 'fakie wheelie' but that's the best way to describe it imo; Seen a few people on various videos do this trick, was just wondering if someone could explain the steps needed to learn it! ~Also, I posted in trials chat and not beginner as I wouldn't really call it a beginner move~ Cheers
  11. We'll fight like sharks, we'll fight like dogs!

  12. Firstly, Brad how did your bars manage that much damage? Secondly, how the hell did the guy in the video manage that? am I missing the jokes here or what haha
  13. What type of clothing? This is irritating, please don't say street/indie
  14. Has anyone heard of the Texas Sharpshooter Logical Fallacy? Seems appropriate here...
  15. Well at least the second page of this argument got a little better. Yes, it should be allowed to be tested with. Illegal drugs have been used in all different parts of different societies for medicinal purposes, cocaine was given to US soldiers during the first world war and cocaine was even in the drink coca cola (around 1940 I believe) to heighten their senses and keep them alert. That nasal decongestant you use? Well that's basically speed, or at least a polymer of amphetamine. Yes, nasal decongestant is amphetamine. Those pills your nan uses to control her heart? Yes, why they are your grandad's viagra (beta blockers and viagra are essentially the same, I know it's not illegal but I'm just making a point) So out of all these, weed is relatively harmless really. Secondly, it should be decriminalised for personal use. It will free up the courts and the prison's for people who actually commit serious crimes. I also think there's a good argument that the government should sell it, the same way it does tobacco or the same way Amsterdam used to (cry cry). The extra money from weed tax would certainly help propel this country out of the recession. Not to mention then that it will cut street dealing and associated crime, also because it would be regulated by the government they can tax it at whatever they decide. Also, kids won't be tempted to try something that is a legal drug and less stigma around the subject means people can be properly educated and people with 'addiction' problems can seek the help they need without fear of prosecution. If the government did legalise it though, they should also force MacDonalds to deliver just like they do in other countries...
  16. Nice Bradd! Camera looks decent too. One criticism, you look like you're about to play little league
  17. New chain and Odyssey linear slik installed, feeling soo smooth!

  18. The fact that Religion can simply exist to serve one man's purpose for literally nothing but to twist the 'sacred teachings' of another. Also, the fact that religion is basically pick and choose teachings, loosely based upon no ideals or anything, then people who are religious simply claim/feel morally superior. I admit, it hasn't got much to do with current topics but I still feel it's an outlandish move on their part. Oh yeah and discrimination and inequality may have been fine hundreds of years a go but quite frankly it's got no place in today's society, especially when religion teaches that all people are 'equal' It just really bugs me that's all.
  19. That's completely ridiculous. Anyone who doesn't support gay marriage and is an attendant of the CoE should realise that their religion ONLY EXISTS because Henry VIII wanted to divorce his wife and the catholic church wouldn't allow it, so he formed the CoE. What utter bullocks. Says a lot about the sanctity of religious sacraments if you ask me.
  20. No because it would look like (2-2) + 10. There is no possible way bidmas would give you 12 from that equation, no matter how you write it.
  21. Yeah ok but you're doing it wrong wrong then Because bidmas doesn't say group the two sums together. You can't parenthesis -2 + 10 at the end of a sum unless it's - -2 + 10. Because the addition first would be +10 then - 2 Not - (2+10) As far as I'm aware, you only parenthesis something that requires work beforehand. I can see your point though, and I'm sorry I can't justify properly as to why it shouldn't be -10, I just know that you don't parenthesis the last part, regardless of bidmas. I'll ask my mate who did a maths degree and see if he can give me a proper reason
  22. My dad did the same thing when my laptop broke and I wanted to use his. I just told him it was faster to load porn on chrome and easier to hide so his gf wouldn't see it
  23. It's still ten. You did everything ok until the end when you put (2+10) into brackets. Here's how I did it... 4 x (2/4) - 2 + 10, 4 x (0.5) + 10 - 2 (swapped these the other way around to deal with bidmas, doesn't particularly matter anyway as 4 x 0.5 = 2 - 2 = 0 + 10 = 10) 4 x (0.5) = 2 + 10 = 12 - 2 = 10. I'm not totally sure why you're not supposed to bracket the last bit but I think it's because you have to leave the addiction and subtraction separate. I think if the original equation was: 4 x 2/4 - -2 + 10 then you could bracket the end bit as it requires work beforehand. Either way dude, just check on a scientific calculator if you're not convinced
×
×
  • Create New...