Gavyn. Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 just watched this video on youtube i'm pretty sure it's comas riding but is it legitimate cause 165 cm is like 66 inches which is 9 inches over what i've seen done before.gav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun H Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) Looks more like 56" to me.And 165cm is 65" Edited November 19, 2006 by Shaun H Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David20 Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) Looks more like 56" to me.And 165cm is 65" 165cm is 66", 165 divided 2.5 is 66 Gavyn's right. Not sure if that sidehop is 66" but whatever it is, its huge Edited November 19, 2006 by David20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavyn. Posted November 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) 165 divided by 30 times 12 = 66 don't it? Edited November 19, 2006 by Gavyn L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 It depends on which part of the sloped floor they measured to on top of the rough shaped rock. If they measured from the lowest point on the floor to the highest point of the rock it may have been that big, but he lands the backwheel on a lower bit, and the front on another lower bit... Still, fair play. No style, but the riding was pretty good I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Kearns Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 It clearly states the sidehop is 1.65 M (m= metres). So its just over 4ft.Dan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewannnn Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) I just looked on my tape measure it's 65" for 165cmHowever that doesnt look 65" at all, looks about 60 max Edited November 19, 2006 by Ewannnn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David20 Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 I just looked on my tape measure it's 65" for 165cmWeird, I thought an inch was 2.5 cm And Danny, your post doesn't make much sense to me... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun H Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 OH MY GOD. Yes thankyou Ewannnnnnn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Bleech Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 And 165cm is 65" 165 divided by 30 times 12 = 66 don't it? but EDIT: too slow, should never have gone for a piss mid reply.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Kearns Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Weird, I thought an inch was 2.5 cm And Danny, your post doesn't make much sense to me... Because there is 3ft 6 inches to a metre and on the video it says when he is sidehopping "1.65 M" (m=metres) not centemetres.So do the maths its around 4ft 3 inch or something.Dan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Goto google and type"165cm in inches"=165 centimeters = 64.9606299 inch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavyn. Posted November 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) It clearly states the sidehop is 1.65 M (m= metres). So its just over 4ft.Dan.it's just under 5.5 feet ok i'm wrong lol but surly it's still not that highso 12 inches does'nt actually equal 30 cm Edited November 19, 2006 by Gavyn L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David20 Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Because there is 3ft 6 inches to a metre and on the video it says when he is sidehopping "1.65 M" (m=metres) not centemetres.So do the maths its around 4ft 3 inch or something.Dan.Yes but there are 100 cm's in a metre so 1.65m = 165cm doesn't it? or am I being really dumb? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Kearns Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Well lets take a look at where his handlebar height is just before he is about to take off for the sidehop and judge.Dan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavyn. Posted November 19, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) Yes but there are 100 cm's in a metre so 1.65m = 165cm doesn't it? or am I being really dumb?nope your right he's being really dumbhttp://www.google.co.uk/search?client=fire...G=Google+Search Edited November 19, 2006 by Gavyn L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Grainger Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 effortlessit looks about 60" i'd say, but things allways look smaller on camera Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben_travis Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 effortlessit looks about 60" i'd say, but things allways look smaller on camerahe is on a MOD. thats bollocks. no way is it 60" im postive it certainly aint 65"i think they are using a TF tape measure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whizza Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 I don't reckon it's as high as that, a few of us have been there and we were messing on that rock. T'is big mind! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Cox Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 that was large to say the least. that place also looks the dogs bollocks for riding!! anyone wanna organise a roadtrip there next year?Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross McArthur Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) i think they are using a TF tape measure. Edited November 19, 2006 by glasvagas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Pitbull Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 This is the reason you get n00bs saying 50 inch is bar hight. Makes people like Neil T and CLS look shit. if people actually measured shit these days you'd realize how big stuff really is. 56 is unbelievably high! so if thats 60 id quite happily eat Danny Comas's shit on webcam and host the video throughout the forum and advertise Monty at the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Smith! Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 This is the reason you get n00bs saying 50 inch is bar hight. Makes people like Neil T and CLS look shit. if people actually measured shit these days you'd realize how big stuff really is. 56 is unbelievably high! so if thats 60 id quite happily eat Danny Comas's shit on webcam and host the video throughout the forum and advertise Monty at the end.Lmao, my bar height is like 37".Tis a big sidehop, but his style is awful.Mat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben_travis Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 Lmao, my bar height is like 37".Tis a big sidehop, but his style is awful.Mati think he means on back wheel! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted November 19, 2006 Report Share Posted November 19, 2006 (edited) Not at all accurate but I guess what he's sidehopping onto is about 1.5m. Blame who made the video, and not Dani himself, he's an utter beast.Edit: also, an inch is 2,54cm not 2,5cm Edited November 19, 2006 by Inur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.