aener

I don't think I will ever "get" moto trials.

That was great. You need more videos making!

'04.

That's 24s for you Seriously though - nicest looking 24 I've seen. Maybe just some green detailing to balance the rims. Stem stackers and/or bar ends'd do it

I'd wager it was the tube exploding, but yeah Insane riding. Me so jelly.

Yep. After Friday I'm free from uni - so any time.

Oh suuuuuuuure. Go when THEY say to! I've been dropping hints for months! (In fairness, they've almost all been directed at Luke, so you're excused ) Sweet riding guys. You three are the ambassadors of style+HUGE.

Awesome watch. Didn't want it to stop! What happened to Joe's wheel? Really hope it was on film somewhere that's yet to surface if it was through riding.

1000, 350, +70, 72.

Just to throw another option out there, I had a creak fitting this description for a while, and then snapped both ends off my front axle. You can enjoy that thought whilst riding around

I haven't read through all this so it might already be in progress, but every time someone quotes a post I made, I get two notifications of it. Not sure if it's the same for PM's - not had one since the upgrade.

Oh I see. I thought by "making your bars lower" you meant making your bars lower (ie. lower/shorter stem and/or less stackers) Rolling them back will help with streety lines, as you meant - I just got the wrong end of the stick. It also won't make the bike any worse for trials-trials. I used to have my bars' rise pointing in the same direction as the stem's shaft. Rolled them back to see how much easier it would bunnyhop, and whilst it's better for them, it's no worse at all for sidehops/gaps/tech lines etc. I find further forwards is only good for trials-trials, where as further back is better for everything (with no ill effect towards trials-trials). I have Monty 221 risers set at about halfway between being perpendicular to the floor and the angle of my headtube.

NO! Other way 'round. It's the same concept on 24 and stock, but to different degrees, obviously.

I don't understand the measurements on the graphics... It's got 272 written on the chainstay - but they're obviously longer than that, leading me to believe the 272mm is the length indicated by the line... My question is: who the hell wants to know how long PART of the effective chainstay length is? If they were going to do those type of graphics, I can't understand why they wouldn't make the measurements that actual geometry of the frame, rather than the lengths of tube sections used.

It's the name of the song Thanks again to people that replied since my last post! Thought the choice in music might go down badly, but since no-one's mentioned it you must be a more accepting bunch than you let on

I wanted that in this one, but those wooden beams are the closest I can get at the minute. Rails are diiiiiiiiiiiiiiiificult. Thanks for kind comments everyone

Good god! How tall are you? You make that thing look like a Mini Master! Sweet video man, really enjoyed watching it. Had a great feel to it.

Luke and I doing a joint video has been talked about pretty much since I moved to Leeds. We finally got 'round to doing something about it, and this is the result of the past two Saturdays. He was making an absolute mockery of Huddersfield and Morley yesterday, so I'm pretty chuffed with it

I'm with Mark on this one. It feels like you want some publicity, and are willing to use the memory of this person to get it. I urge you to drop it.

.

Was so chuffed for you when you did that gap in Hinckley Getting some pretty hefty stuff done, the both of you!

That wasn't sarcasm. I was serious.

Also: http://www.trials-forum.co.uk/user/6343-dan6061/ Edit: Damn it, Err!

I had some pads that were better than LGMs once. They were called Magura Blacks.

...Take it off