alextheferret Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 I still belive it was the American goverment, for example: Two weeks before 9/11 the owner of the building renewed the insurance to include protection from terriost attacks.BBC announced live 20 minutes BEFORE tower 7 collapsed that it had fallen down, when it was clearly visable in the background.On 9/11 they had arranged a firefighting course in New York, so there were already loads of more firefighters in the city than ususal. errr...Explosives where planted in the building, as it collapsed you could see them going off to make sure they could claim on it. Just search it in youtube im sure theres a video!The man that insured the building got millions of punds from it falling over.Tower 7 that magically fell down, contained many gverment documents that where explaining a decline some goverment thingy.I havent written a long post like that for a while. Theres more about it somewhere but i have strong beliefs that it was the goverment.Still R.I.P the victims of 9/11, that program about the hotel last night was pretty amazing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali C Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 1) BBC announced live 20 minutes BEFORE tower 7 collapsed that it had fallen down, when it was clearly visable in the background.2) Explosives where planted in the building, as it collapsed you could see them going off to make sure they could claim on it. Just search it in youtube im sure theres a video!3) Tower 7 that magically fell down, contained many gverment documents that where explaining a decline some goverment thingy.1) That reporter was in the middle of a confusing situation, she just reads whats in front of here....The firefighters trying to save the building all evacuated as they feared it would collapse...chinese whispers ect ect.2) I don't believe it had exsplosives in the building. The air pressure from the building above crashing down would be more than enough to blow windows out (as seen in the videos of the collapse)3) Did you see the back of tower 7? there was hardly anything left! One of the falling Twin Towers pretty much fell on Tower 7 damaging it beyond repair and setting it ablaze with jet fuel.Saying that, there are some pretty dodgy things. The Hexagen...no plane wreckage found, a nice neat hole through layers of re-enforced concrete and goverment agents seizing cctv footage from the building across the road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MadManMike Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Saying that, there are some pretty dodgy things. The Hexagen...no plane wreckage found, a nice neat hole through layers of re-enforced concrete and goverment agents seizing cctv footage from the building across the road.Pentagon But yeah, that smells fishy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al_Fel Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 1) That reporter was in the middle of a confusing situation, she just reads whats in front of here....The firefighters trying to save the building all evacuated as they feared it would collapse...chinese whispers ect ect.2) I don't believe it had exsplosives in the building. The air pressure from the building above crashing down would be more than enough to blow windows out (as seen in the videos of the collapse)3) Did you see the back of tower 7? there was hardly anything left! One of the falling Twin Towers pretty much fell on Tower 7 damaging it beyond repair and setting it ablaze with jet fuel.Saying that, there are some pretty dodgy things. The Hexagen...no plane wreckage found, a nice neat hole through layers of re-enforced concrete and goverment agents seizing cctv footage from the building across the road.When did they build the othe side? lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Harrison Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 I love the way that most of the people that real off these 'facts' that imply a conspiracy theory only quote them from biased sources, i.e. the w'nker behind Loose Change.I went to a public screening of that film, with him there presenting. From the moment he began speaking, it was clear that unless you already believed his views, you were unwelcome. And he went on to pull some pretty sly tricks and turn the audience against anyone who dare raise a question, simply getting everyone to ridicule them.So far I'm yet to see even a remotely plausible suggestion for an alternative to Al Qaeda being responsible. If your life is that boring, and you really want to believe in this shite, then by all means, go ahead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nick Riviera Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Sounds like commie talk to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haz Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Sounds like commie talk to me.Easy there, comrade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anzo Posted September 11, 2008 Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 Loose Change...The biggest pile of crap to be shat out onto a screen.Most probably believed by the same people who think we all should be dead now from the LHC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thefletch Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 Lets just forget it dude I was being funny with you. Its not really a big deal to be honest.Lets all just be buddies and get on with things, deal?dealTruth is, unless you do the research yourself you will never get, or be able to give, an unbias opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UrbanPoet Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 ]Saying that, there are some pretty dodgy things. The Hexagen...no plane wreckage found, a nice neat hole through layers of re-enforced concrete and goverment agents seizing cctv footage from the building across the road.Surely video is relavent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali C Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 bit of a difference between a small fighter and a multi engined passenger plane, also I bet the passenger plane was going slower that 500mphPS I meant Pentagon, but I prefer Hexagon sounds more.....Devilish!!!!PPS, I am neither here nor there when it comes to conspiracies on 11/9, some are just plain stupid, but others are a bit weird..some are even Gophers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 I don't understand why people find it so hard to believe that the police/FBI/CIA would confiscate CCTV footage? There was a shoplifter in the store near me in London, the police 'confiscated' all the CCTV tapes so they could view them. When there were the serial bombings (Not the 7/7 ones, waaaay back) in London, the police confiscated CCTV footage from all public transport from all around the city for the week before the attack, and from the street cameras and shop cameras. Using that footage, they caught the bomber. CCTV footage is necessary to investigate things, it's not hard to work out that they'd need it to check it out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali C Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 sounds reasonable. I still think it was the Gophers though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.