Laurence--Trials Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Anyone think this is a LUSH frame? Any pictures of one built up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isitafox Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 I like it, but I'm too much of a weight weenie at the moment to justify having one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laurence--Trials Posted October 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Same and the fact i'm on 24" too, but i just think its a really nice, simple looking frame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex-trials-boy Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Looks ok to be fair not realy been to keen on any of the yaabaa frames. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laurence--Trials Posted October 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Wheelbase 1085mm BB Height +60mm Chainstay length 380mm Rear hub spacing 116mm Weight 1850g Yaaaaaaaaaaay, found some pictures of it: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.Wood Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 For me, personally, they should have made it +35 and 135mm rear end, to fill that gap in the market. Other than that looks like a pretty good value frame, although bb yoke could be a bit cleaner looking. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i like cunning stunts Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Off tarty Weight: 1.977kg ,, far too heavy when you compare it with other frames around the same price.. Nice design though. Edited October 28, 2011 by Jake-Ansell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koxxboy14 Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 like the geo of it, but its just to much of a tank Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 far too heavy when you compare it with other frames around the same price. People keep saying that they want stronger frames though, so I think it's aimed at them. And yeah, 116mm rear end = not ideal, but I guess that's the way Koxx are going these days. Keeps it simpler/cheaper for them, although it does sort of make it a little more inconvenient for the people who actually want to buy them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max-t Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Horrible geo, but I like the fact they have beefed it up to suit the street riders 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewG Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 except for 116mm dropounts and relative short WB(for me) it´s great frame which could be strong in compare with other frames on market IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trialsnoobie Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) what idiot has put carbon forks on a heavy street frame oh dear they just dont get it do they Edited October 28, 2011 by trialsnoobie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostrider88 Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 what idiot has put carbon forks on a heavy street frame oh dear they just dont get it do they What idiot comments on what somebody else has put on his bike?He had the money and wanted those forks,why wouldn´t he use them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greetings Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Using a TryAll Carbon fork on one of these frames is as odd as buying the lightest frame on the market and filling it with concrete. Not a fan of white frames but the full build looks fantastic. Partly due to how simple the bike looks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trialsnoobie Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Using a TryAll Carbon fork on one of these frames is as odd as buying the lightest frame on the market and filling it with concrete. exactly, it looks nice yes but it's totally illogical Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canardweb Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 Using a TryAll Carbon fork on one of these frames is as odd as buying the lightest frame on the market and filling it with concrete. Not a fan of white frames but the full build looks fantastic. Partly due to how simple the bike looks. exactly, it looks nice yes but it's totally illogical I already answered that in the original thread! My friend liked the geo and wanted to be happy riding his bike! So he bought nice components for it... That's all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super Posted October 28, 2011 Report Share Posted October 28, 2011 (edited) Nevermind the carbon forks, what about the fact that it's "a heavy street frame" with a bb height of +60mm??????? Also 116mm spacing doesn't belong on a stock. Edited October 28, 2011 by super Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filo Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 Wonder if the build quality is thesame as the stinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Vandart Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 what idiot has put carbon forks on a heavy street frame oh dear they just dont get it do they Maybe he wants a strong natty frame but not so heavy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostrider88 Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 Maybe he wants a strong natty frame but not so heavy? That´s impossible man,nobody wants that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark W Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 Nevermind the carbon forks, what about the fact that it's "a heavy street frame" with a bb height of +60mm??????? Tunni seems to do alright on his Pure, and that's +55mm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i like cunning stunts Posted October 29, 2011 Report Share Posted October 29, 2011 That was my point before, has anyone had any problems with the pure yet? I doubt it ive had one they are very strong considering there weight they are nearly half a kg lighter than these frames so whats the point of this frame again?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.