JD™

You wanna talk about alignment?

I'm not crying. You're crying.

2 vehicles to MOT this month. The dead cert just failed and cost me £600, bring on the expensive one!

I've been banished to the man cave so I've spent the night being passively agressive to many online. No-ones bitten. Youre all cunts.

I believe it says "The humans are dead"

No apologising for posting that beast, and don't stop either!

Probably worth giving Euan a shout on FB if you have it and him. That seems to be his bag.

Thanks for the advice all. I thought "f**k it, it's an old Land Rover, I'll give it a go as is first" and it went first time. Smoky as f**k, but hopefully that'll ease off once I can give it a run.

Diesel engines thatve sat for a while (couple of years) but were fine beforehand. What should I look at to get it started? Currently charging the battery but just preempting any issues. Should I be dropping the fuel for fresh stuff for instance?

Did you cut the keyboard and the can in the same project, or were they done separately?

Lol. 'My side', while saying I ride without brakes. I'm out on this one, just to save you making yourself look like more of an idiot.

In opposite land, maybe. But actually I was saying the cyclist was being treated fairly - which is what they all want. 'Fair' has both negative possibilities as well as positive ones. Cyclists want - quite rightly - to be treated fairly in terms of space on the roads, but that means taking the negatives with class too. You are exactly what I'm talking about - an entitled prat who only wants the positive side and as such can't see that the cyclist was in the wrong. I ride without brakes, if I hit someone it's my fault and I'll take my punishment.

It quite literally isn't.

It's the law to have working brakes on a cycle on a public highway. The same is not true of rubber bumpers on skateboards.

edit: double

As usual for a cyclist, completely flipping the point. I'm not saying the extra width implies entitlement, I'm saying that the width should not be implied if you don't have it. Personally, when I'm in a more vulnerable I tend to act accordingly, not expect that everyone around me shouldn't kill me and thus I'm invincible. Ironically, that also applies to pedestrians compared to cyclists, so luckily in this incident everyone was a prat. My point is that if it'd been an unsafe and illegal car vs a pedestrian the car driver would be inside, and so should this guy.

They're also almost infinitely less wide but want cars to treat them as the same width. What a shitter equality can be, eh?

If it was a car, they'd get done in the same way or worse both in the media and the courts. Especially if the car didn't have brakes. Cyclists always want to be given the same rights as other road users, so they'd best take the same punishments too.

If I hadn't already had a wedding you'd be high on the list

I thought the same. 14th on this list: http://www.alltime-athletics.com/m4x100ok.htm

One day...

They're taking the "n+1" thing about the perfect number of bikes to own a bit too seriously.

Oh, Chris

I haven't watched the video, based on the fact I've found nearly all of his content annoying in some way and the spiffing reviews here, but this sort of comment always cracks me up. It's a video based around doing tricks on a bike. If you're looking for purpose you're in the wrong place.

I think you're doing a disservice to the rocking chair there Ross.